Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 101
Filter
1.
Nurs Educ Perspect ; 2023 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20234213

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The COVID-19 pandemic has shifted how nursing education and information are delivered, with many classes being moved to an online platform. This opened opportunities to find creative ways to engage students. As a result, an entirely online infographic assignment for final-year baccalaureate nursing students was created. The focus of this assignment was to engage students to identify important health issues, consider multilevel solutions, and communicate information to relevant stakeholders using visual storytelling for maximum impact.

2.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1145275, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304114

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Wastewater-based surveillance emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic as an efficient way to quickly screen large populations, monitor infectious disease transmission over time, and identify whether more virulent strains are becoming more prevalent in the region without burdening the health care system with individualized testing. Ohio was one of the first states to implement wastewater monitoring through its Ohio Coronavirus Wastewater Monitoring Network (OCWMN), originally tracking the prevalence of COVID-19 by quantitative qPCR from over 67 sites across the state. The OCWMN evolved along with the pandemic to include sequencing the SARS-CoV-2 genome to assess variants of concern circulating within the population. As the pandemic wanes, networks such as OCWMN can be expanded to monitor other infectious diseases and outbreaks of interest to the health department to reduce the burden of communicable diseases. However, most surveillance still utilizes qPCR based diagnostic tests for individual pathogens, which is hard to scale for surveillance of multiple pathogens. Methods: Here we have tested several genomic methods, both targeted and untargeted, for wastewater-based biosurveillance to find the most efficient procedure to detect and track trends in reportable infectious diseases and outbreaks of known pathogens as well as potentially novel pathogens or variants on the rise in our communities. RNA extracts from the OCWMN were provided weekly from 10 sites for 6 weeks. Total RNA was sequenced from the samples on the Illumina NextSeq and on the MinION to identify pathogens present. The MinION long read platform was also used to sequence SARS-CoV-2 with the goal of reducing the complexity of variant calling in mixed populations as occurs with short Illumina reads. Finally, a targeted hybridization approach was tested for compatibility with wastewater RNA samples. Results and discussion: The data analyzed here provides a baseline assessment that demonstrates that wastewater is a rich resource for infectious disease epidemiology and identifies technology gaps and potential solutions to enable this resource to be used by public health laboratories to monitor the infectious disease landscape of the regions they serve.


Subject(s)
Biosurveillance , COVID-19 , Communicable Diseases , Humans , Wastewater , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , RNA
3.
Ann Intern Med ; 176(5): 667-675, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2302441

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous trials have demonstrated the effects of fluvoxamine alone and inhaled budesonide alone for prevention of disease progression among outpatients with COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the combination of fluvoxamine and inhaled budesonide would increase treatment effects in a highly vaccinated population. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, adaptive platform trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04727424). SETTING: 12 clinical sites in Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: Symptomatic adults with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and a known risk factor for progression to severe disease. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to either fluvoxamine (100 mg twice daily for 10 days) plus inhaled budesonide (800 mcg twice daily for 10 days) or matching placebos. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite of emergency setting retention for COVID-19 for more than 6 hours, hospitalization, and/or suspected complications due to clinical progression of COVID-19 within 28 days of randomization. Secondary outcomes included health care attendance (defined as hospitalization for any cause or emergency department visit lasting >6 hours), time to hospitalization, mortality, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: Randomization occurred from 15 January to 6 July 2022. A total of 738 participants were allocated to oral fluvoxamine plus inhaled budesonide, and 738 received placebo. The proportion of patients observed in an emergency setting for COVID-19 for more than 6 hours or hospitalized due to COVID-19 was lower in the treatment group than the placebo group (1.8% [95% credible interval {CrI}, 1.1% to 3.0%] vs. 3.7% [95% CrI, 2.5% to 5.3%]; relative risk, 0.50 [95% CrI, 0.25 to 0.92]), with a probability of superiority of 98.7%. No relative effects were found between groups for any of the secondary outcomes. More adverse events occurred in the intervention group than the placebo group, but no important differences between the groups were detected. LIMITATION: Low event rate overall, consistent with contemporary trials in vaccinated populations. CONCLUSION: Treatment with oral fluvoxamine plus inhaled budesonide among high-risk outpatients with early COVID-19 reduced the incidence of severe disease requiring advanced care. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Latona Foundation, FastGrants, and Rainwater Charitable Foundation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Budesonide/adverse effects , Fluvoxamine , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Treatment Outcome
4.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 12(1): 2204166, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2295405

ABSTRACT

Because of the large number of infected individuals, an estimate of the future burdens of the long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection is needed. This systematic review examined associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection and incidence of categories of and selected chronic conditions, by age and severity of infection (inpatient vs. outpatient/mixed care). MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched (1 January 2020 to 4 October 2022) and reference lists scanned. We included observational studies from high-income OECD countries with a control group adjusting for sex and comorbidities. Identified records underwent a two-stage screening process. Two reviewers screened 50% of titles/abstracts, after which DistillerAI acted as second reviewer. Two reviewers then screened the full texts of stage one selections. One reviewer extracted data and assessed risk of bias; results were verified by another. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled hazard ratios (HR). GRADE assessed certainty of the evidence. Twenty-five studies were included. Among the outpatient/mixed SARS-CoV-2 care group, there is high certainty of a small-to-moderate increase (i.e. HR 1.26-1.99) among adults ≥65 years of any cardiovascular condition, and of little-to-no difference (i.e. HR 0.75-1.25) in anxiety disorders for individuals <18, 18-64, and ≥65 years old. Among 18-64 and ≥65 year-olds receiving outpatient/mixed care there are probably (moderate certainty) large increases (i.e. HR ≥2.0) in encephalopathy, interstitial lung disease, and respiratory failure. After SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is probably an increased risk of diagnoses for some chronic conditions; whether the magnitude of risk will remain stable into the future is uncertain.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Incidence , Chronic Disease
5.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 10(4): ofad189, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2292576

ABSTRACT

Immunocompromised patients with B-cell deficiencies are at risk for prolonged symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We describe 4 patients treated for B-cell malignancies with B-cell-depleting therapies who developed persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection and had resolution of symptoms following an extended course of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

6.
Annals of hepatology ; 2023.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2282000

ABSTRACT

Introduction and Objectives : Psychosocial stressors related to the coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic increased alcohol consumption. The effect on patients with alcohol-related liver diseases remains unclear. Materials and Methods : Hospitalizations at a tertiary care center due to alcohol-related liver disease from March 1 through August 31 in 2019 (pre-pandemic cohort) and 2020 (pandemic cohort) were reviewed retrospectively. Differences in patient demographics, disease features, and outcomes were estimated in patients with alcoholic hepatitis utilizing T-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, Chi-square and Fisher Exact Tests and Anova models and logistic regression models in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Results : 146 patients with alcoholic hepatitis and 305 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis were admitted during the pandemic compared to 75 and 396 in the pre-pandemic cohort. Despite similar median Maddrey Scores (41.20 vs. 37.45, p=0.57), patients were 25% less likely to receive steroids during the pandemic. Patients with alcoholic hepatitis admitted during the pandemic were more likely to have hepatic encephalopathy (0.13;95% CI:0.01, 0.25), variceal hemorrhage (0.14;95% CI:0.04, 0.25), require oxygen (0.11;95% CI:0.01, 0.21), vasopressors (OR:3.49;95% CI:1.27, 12.01) and hemodialysis (OR:3.70;95% CI:1.22, 15.13). On average, patients with alcoholic cirrhosis had MELD-Na scores 3.77 points higher (95% CI:1.05, 13.46) as compared to the pre-pandemic and had higher odds of experiencing hepatic encephalopathy (OR:1.34;95% CI:1.04, 1.73), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (OR:1.88;95% CI:1.03, 3.43), ascites (OR:1.40, 95% CI:1.10, 1.79), vasopressors (OR:1.68, 95% CI:1.14, 2.46) or inpatient mortality (OR:2.00, 95% CI:1.33, 2.99) than the pre-pandemic. Conclusions : Patients with alcohol-related liver disease experienced worse outcomes during the pandemic.

7.
Can J Aging ; : 1-4, 2023 Feb 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286795

ABSTRACT

A disproportionate share of the health impacts of COVID-19 has been borne by older adults, particularly those in long-term care facilities (LTCs). Vaccination has been critical to efforts to combat this issue, but as we begin to emerge from this pandemic, questions remain about how to protect the health of residents of LTC and assisted living facilities proactively in order to prevent such a disaster from occurring again. Vaccination, not just against COVID-19, but also against other vaccine-preventable illness, will be a key component of this effort. However, there are currently substantial gaps in the uptake of vaccines recommended for older adults. Technology offers an opportunity to assist in filling these vaccination gaps. Our experiences in Fredericton, New Brunswick suggest that a digital immunization solution would facilitate better uptake of adult vaccines for older adults in assisted and independent living facilities and would help policy and decision makers to identify coverage gaps and develop interventions to protect these individuals.

8.
Cureus ; 15(2): e35255, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2266771

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Subgroups of the general population including Hispanic/Latinx individuals report higher rates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy than non-Hispanic White individuals. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that influence attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines among unvaccinated Hispanic adults utilizing a free community clinic in Orlando, Florida, USA. METHODS: From May 2021 to July 2021, we used convenience sampling to recruit 20 self-identified Hispanic adults who were unvaccinated to complete an individual, semi-structured interview. Interview questions were derived from constructs from the Health Belief Model. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated (when necessary), and qualitatively analyzed using inductive content analysis to identify recurring themes. RESULTS: Of the 20 participants in this study, 65% were female (n=13) and they ranged from 21 to 73 years of age (median age =42.5). We identified three primary themes in participant responses regarding their beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Primary theme 1: trust and clarity of COVID-19 vaccine information, with subthemes (1a) source trustworthiness, and (1b) clarity of COVID-19 vaccine information. Primary theme 2: personal contextual factors, with subthemes (2a) underlying health conditions, (2b) personal experiences with COVID-19, and (2c) immigration. Primary theme 3: lack of confidence, yet willingness to be vaccinated, with subthemes (3a) fear and distrust and (3b) willingness to be vaccinated. In summary, participants felt hesitant, although not completely opposed, to receiving COVID-19 vaccinations due to the information they gathered on vaccines from various sources received in the context of important personal factors (e.g., immigration, underlying health concerns, etc.). CONCLUSIONS: Overcoming vaccine hesitancy in vulnerable populations such as the Hispanic communities may require addressing issues of message clarity through trusted sources while considering personal contextual factors. Healthcare professionals can begin by initiating discussions with patients to understand individual circumstances and concerns and provide information on COVID-19 vaccines that clarify areas of confusion.

9.
Midwifery ; 121: 103655, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2277362

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in pregnant women are generally highest in the first trimester and then decrease throughout pregnancy, reaching their lowest point in the postpartum period. Pregnant women are a high-risk population for mortality and mental health symptoms due to COVID-19. However, the extent to which the chronic stress of the COVID-19 pandemic alters the trajectory of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in pregnant/postpartum women is unknown. METHODS: Women (N=127) who were pregnant or who had given birth less than one month prior were recruited via online advertising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were assessed up to three times during the pregnancy and at 1-month postpartum for depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), anxiety, and stress (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21). Random intercepts models examined symptom change over time as well as predictors of elevated postpartum psychopathology. RESULTS: On average, women completed their surveys at 8.5 weeks (first trimester), 21 weeks (second trimester), 32 weeks (third trimester) and 7-weeks postpartum. Women reported mild-moderate levels of depression, anxiety, and stress throughout pregnancy. There was a significant change in symptoms of depression and anxiety over time which was best represented by a quadratic rather than linear trajectory: symptoms increased until week 23-25 and then decreased. Stress levels remained consistently elevated over time. Higher symptom levels at 1-month postpartum were predicted by younger age, lower social support, and worry about going to a healthcare facility. Change in routine due to COVID-19 was not predictive of symptom trajectory from pregnancy to postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: During COVID-19, symptoms of depression and anxiety increased from early to mid-pregnancy but then declined slightly while stress levels remained elevated. Observed reductions in symptoms were small. Given the substantial persistent impact of perinatal distress and poor mental health on maternal and fetal health, providers should be aware of heightened levels of these symptoms in pregnant women during large-scale external health stressors such as COVID-19, and should implement screening procedures to identify and appropriately intervene with at-risk women.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Depression, Postpartum , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Depression/diagnosis , Longitudinal Studies , Pandemics , Anxiety/diagnosis , Postpartum Period/psychology , Parturition , Depression, Postpartum/psychology
10.
J Am Chem Soc ; 145(14): 8021-8032, 2023 04 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2258050

ABSTRACT

Interactions between the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and ACE2 are one of the most scrutinized reactions of our time. Yet, questions remain as to the impact of glycans on mediating ACE2 dimerization and downstream interactions with Spike. Here, we address these unanswered questions by combining a glycoengineering strategy with high-resolution native mass spectrometry (MS) to investigate the impact of N-glycan occupancy on the assembly of multiple Spike-ACE2 complexes. We confirmed that intact Spike trimers have all 66 N-linked sites occupied. For monomeric ACE2, all seven N-linked glycan sites are occupied to various degrees; six sites have >90% occupancy, while the seventh site (Asn690) is only partially occupied (∼30%). By resolving the glycoforms on ACE2, we deciphered the influence of each N-glycan on ACE2 dimerization. Unexpectedly, we found that Asn432 plays a role in mediating dimerization, a result confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis. We also found that glycosylated dimeric ACE2 and Spike trimers form complexes with multiple stoichiometries (Spike-ACE2 and Spike2-ACE2) with dissociation constants (Kds) of ∼500 and <100 nM, respectively. Comparing these values indicates that positive cooperativity may drive ACE2 dimers to complex with multiple Spike trimers. Overall, our results show that occupancy has a key regulatory role in mediating interactions between ACE2 dimers and Spike trimers. More generally, since soluble ACE2 (sACE2) retains an intact SARS-CoV-2 interaction site, the importance of glycosylation in ACE2 dimerization and the propensity for Spike and ACE2 to assemble into higher oligomers are molecular details important for developing strategies for neutralizing the virus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/chemistry , Protein Binding , Mass Spectrometry , Polysaccharides
11.
Ann Hepatol ; 28(3): 101088, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2282001

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Psychosocial stressors related to the coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic increased alcohol consumption. The effect on patients with alcohol-related liver diseases remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospitalizations at a tertiary care center due to alcohol-related liver disease from March 1 through August 31 in 2019 (pre-pandemic cohort) and 2020 (pandemic cohort) were reviewed retrospectively. Differences in patient demographics, disease features, and outcomes were estimated in patients with alcoholic hepatitis utilizing T-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, Chi-square and Fisher Exact Tests and Anova models and logistic regression models in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. RESULTS: 146 patients with alcoholic hepatitis and 305 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis were admitted during the pandemic compared to 75 and 396 in the pre-pandemic cohort. Despite similar median Maddrey Scores (41.20 vs. 37.45, p=0.57), patients were 25% less likely to receive steroids during the pandemic. Patients with alcoholic hepatitis admitted during the pandemic were more likely to have hepatic encephalopathy (0.13; 95% CI:0.01, 0.25), variceal hemorrhage (0.14; 95% CI:0.04, 0.25), require oxygen (0.11; 95% CI:0.01, 0.21), vasopressors (OR:3.49; 95% CI:1.27, 12.01) and hemodialysis (OR:3.70; 95% CI:1.22, 15.13). On average, patients with alcoholic cirrhosis had MELD-Na scores 3.77 points higher (95% CI:1.05, 13.46) as compared to the pre-pandemic and had higher odds of experiencing hepatic encephalopathy (OR:1.34; 95% CI:1.04, 1.73), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (OR:1.88; 95% CI:1.03, 3.43), ascites (OR:1.40, 95% CI:1.10, 1.79), vasopressors (OR:1.68, 95% CI:1.14, 2.46) or inpatient mortality (OR:2.00, 95% CI:1.33, 2.99) than the pre-pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with alcohol-related liver disease experienced worse outcomes during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Esophageal and Gastric Varices , Hepatic Encephalopathy , Hepatitis, Alcoholic , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic/therapy , Hepatic Encephalopathy/epidemiology , Pandemics , Hepatitis, Alcoholic/diagnosis , Hepatitis, Alcoholic/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Prognosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology
12.
Psychiatry Res ; 317: 114877, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2250909

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to investigate: (1) the prevalence of perceived racial discrimination (PRD) in school, among racial/ethnic minority adolescents, and (2) the association between PRD and suicidal behaviors among racial/ethnic minority adolescents in the United States. Data from a sample of 3241 racial/ethnic minority adolescents (53.7% female) from the 2021 Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey were analyzed using binary logistic regression. Controlling for other factors, racial/ethnic minority adolescents who experienced PRD had 1.57 times higher odds of experiencing suicidal ideation (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.57, 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) = 1.09-2.25), 1.64 times higher odds of making a suicide plan (AOR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.09-2.49), and 1.67 times higher odds of attempting suicide (AOR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.04-2.68) during the past year. Other factors associated with suicidal behaviors included self-identifying as lesbian/gay, bisexual, or other/questioning; experiencing cyberbullying; feeling sad or hopeless; and poor mental health during the pandemic. The findings of this study extend past research and demonstrate that racial/ethnic minority adolescents who experienced PRD were more likely to report suicidal behaviors over and above other well-established risk factors for suicidal behaviors. Future studies that employ longitudinal designs are needed to elucidate mechanisms underlying these associations.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior , Racism , Humans , Adolescent , Female , United States/epidemiology , Male , Suicidal Ideation , Ethnicity , Ethnic and Racial Minorities , Minority Groups
13.
J Clin Med ; 12(1)2022 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2239825

ABSTRACT

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has been implicated as a risk factor for severe consequences from COVID-19. We evaluated the genetic architecture shared between AMD and COVID-19 (critical illness, hospitalization, and infections) using analyses of genetic correlations and pleiotropy (i.e., cross-phenotype meta-analysis) of AMD (n = 33,976) and COVID-19 (n ≥ 1,388,342) and subsequent analyses including expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL), differential gene expression, and Mendelian randomization (MR). We observed a significant genetic correlation between AMD and COVID-19 infection (rG = 0.10, p = 0.02) and identified novel genome-wide significant associations near PDGFB (best SNP: rs130651; p = 2.4 × 10-8) in the pleiotropy analysis of the two diseases. The disease-risk allele of rs130651 was significantly associated with increased gene expression levels of PDGFB in multiple tissues (best eQTL p = 1.8 × 10-11 in whole blood) and immune cells (best eQTL p = 7.1 × 10-20 in T-cells). PDGFB expression was observed to be higher in AMD cases than AMD controls {fold change (FC) = 1.02; p = 0.067}, as well as in the peak COVID-19 symptom stage (11-20 days after the symptom onset) compared to early/progressive stage (0-10 days) among COVID-19 patients over age 40 (FC = 2.17; p = 0.03) and age 50 (FC = 2.15; p = 0.04). Our MR analysis found that the liability of AMD risk derived from complement system dysfunction {OR (95% CI); hospitalization = 1.02 (1.01-1.03), infection = 1.02 (1.01-1.03) and increased levels of serum cytokine PDGF-BB {ß (95% CI); critical illness = 0.07 (0.02-0.11)} are significantly associated with COVID-19 outcomes. Our study demonstrated that the liability of AMD is associated with an increased risk of COVID-19, and PDGFB may be responsible for the severe COVID-19 outcomes among AMD patients.

14.
medrxiv; 2023.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2023.02.21.23286181

ABSTRACT

Because of the large number of infected individuals, an estimate of the future burdens of the long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection is needed. This systematic review examined associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection and incidence of categories of and selected chronic conditions, by age and severity of infection (inpatient vs. outpatient/mixed care). MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched (Jan 1, 2020 to Oct 4, 2022) and reference lists scanned. We included observational studies from high-income OECD countries with a control group adjusting for sex and comorbidities. Identified records underwent a two-stage screening process. Two reviewers screened 50% of titles/abstracts, after which DistillerAI acted as second reviewer. Two reviewers then screened the full texts of stage one selections. One reviewer extracted data and assessed risk of bias; results were verified by another. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled hazard ratios (HR). GRADE assessed certainty of the evidence. Twenty-five studies were included. Among the outpatient/mixed SARS-CoV-2 care group, there is high certainty of a small-to-moderate increase (i.e., HR 1.26 to 1.99) among adults [≥]65 years of any cardiovascular condition, and of little-to-no difference (i.e., HR 0.75 to 1.25) in anxiety disorders for individuals <18, 18-64, and [≥]65 years old. Among 18-64 and [≥]65 year-olds receiving outpatient/mixed care there are probably (moderate certainty) large increases (i.e., HR [≥]2.0) in encephalopathy, interstitial lung disease, and respiratory failure. After SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is probably an increased risk of diagnoses for some chronic conditions; whether the magnitude of risk will remain stable into the future is uncertain.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , COVID-19 , Brain Diseases , Respiratory Insufficiency
15.
Health Justice ; 11(1): 5, 2023 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2234860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Correctional settings are hotspots for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Social and biological risk factors contribute to higher rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among justice-involved individuals. Rapidly identifying new cases in congregate settings is essential to promote proper isolation and quarantine. We sought perspectives of individuals incarcerated during COVID-19 on how to improve carceral infection control and their perspectives on acceptability of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) accompanying individual testing. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 adults who self-reported being incarcerated throughout the United States between March 2020 and May 2021. We asked participants about facility enforcement of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19 guidelines, and acceptability of integrating WBS into SARS-CoV-2 monitoring strategies at their most recent facility. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the study sample and report on acceptability of WBS. We analyzed qualitative data thematically using an iterative process. RESULTS: Participants were predominantly Black or multiple races (50%) and men (75%); 46 years old on average. Most received a mask during their most recent incarceration (90%), although only 40% received counseling on proper mask wearing. A quarter of participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 at intake. Most (70%) believed they were exposed to the virus while incarcerated. Reoccurring themes included (1) Correctional facility environment leading to a sense of insecurity, (2) Perceptions that punitive conditions in correctional settings were exacerbated by the pandemic; (3) Importance of peers as a source of information about mitigation measures; (4) Perceptions that the safety of correctional environments differed from that of the community during the pandemic; and (5) WBS as a logical strategy, with most (68%) believing WBS would work in the last correctional facility they were in, and 79% preferred monitoring SARS-CoV-2 levels through WBS rather than relying on just individual testing. CONCLUSION: Participants supported routine WBS to monitor for SARS-CoV-2. Integrating WBS into existing surveillance strategies at correctional facilities may minimize the impact of future COVID-19 outbreaks while conserving already constrained resources. To enhance the perception and reality that correctional systems are maximizing mitigation, future measures might include focusing on closer adherence to CDC recommendations and clarity about disease pathogenesis with residents.

16.
N Engl J Med ; 388(6): 518-528, 2023 02 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2234819

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of a single dose of pegylated interferon lambda in preventing clinical events among outpatients with acute symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, adaptive platform trial involving predominantly vaccinated adults with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in Brazil and Canada. Outpatients who presented with an acute clinical condition consistent with Covid-19 within 7 days after the onset of symptoms received either pegylated interferon lambda (single subcutaneous injection, 180 µg) or placebo (single injection or oral). The primary composite outcome was hospitalization (or transfer to a tertiary hospital) or an emergency department visit (observation for >6 hours) due to Covid-19 within 28 days after randomization. RESULTS: A total of 933 patients were assigned to receive pegylated interferon lambda (2 were subsequently excluded owing to protocol deviations) and 1018 were assigned to receive placebo. Overall, 83% of the patients had been vaccinated, and during the trial, multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants had emerged. A total of 25 of 931 patients (2.7%) in the interferon group had a primary-outcome event, as compared with 57 of 1018 (5.6%) in the placebo group, a difference of 51% (relative risk, 0.49; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.30 to 0.76; posterior probability of superiority to placebo, >99.9%). Results were generally consistent in analyses of secondary outcomes, including time to hospitalization for Covid-19 (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.33 to 0.95) and Covid-19-related hospitalization or death (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.35 to 0.97). The effects were consistent across dominant variants and independent of vaccination status. Among patients with a high viral load at baseline, those who received pegylated interferon lambda had lower viral loads by day 7 than those who received placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among predominantly vaccinated outpatients with Covid-19, the incidence of hospitalization or an emergency department visit (observation for >6 hours) was significantly lower among those who received a single dose of pegylated interferon lambda than among those who received placebo. (Funded by FastGrants and others; TOGETHER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04727424.).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Interferon Lambda , Adult , Humans , Bayes Theorem , COVID-19/therapy , Double-Blind Method , Interferon Lambda/administration & dosage , Interferon Lambda/adverse effects , Interferon Lambda/therapeutic use , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , Ambulatory Care , Injections, Subcutaneous , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Vaccination
17.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 7(1): e24, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2237153

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented need for population-level clinical trials focused on the discovery of life-saving therapies and treatments. However, there is limited information on perception of research participation among perinatal populations, a population of particular interest during the pandemic. Methods: Eligible respondents were 18 years or older, were currently pregnant or had an infant (≤12 months old), and lived in Florida within 50 miles of sites participating in the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. Respondents were recruited via Qualtrics panels between April and September 2020. Respondents completed survey items about barriers and facilitators to participation and answered sociodemographic questions. Results: Of 533 respondents, most were between 25 and 34 years of age (n = 259, 49%) and identified as White (n = 303, 47%) and non-Hispanic (n = 344, 65%). Facebook was the most popular social media platform among our respondents. The most common barriers to research participation included poor explanation of study goals, discomforts to the infant, and time commitment. Recruitment through healthcare providers was perceived as the best way to learn about clinical research studies. When considering research participation, "myself" had the greatest influence, followed by familial ties. Noninvasive biological samples were highly acceptable. Hispanics had higher positive perspectives on willingness to participate in a randomized study (p = 0.009). Education (p = 0.007) had significant effects on willingness to release personal health information. Conclusion: When recruiting women during the pregnancy and postpartum periods for perinatal studies, investigators should consider protocols that account for common barriers and preferred study information sources. Social media-based recruitment is worthy of adoption.

18.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 2022 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2233314

ABSTRACT

To date, two published randomized trials have indicated a clinical benefit of early treatment with fluvoxamine versus placebo for adults with symptomatic COVID-19. Using the results of the largest of these trials, the TOGETHER trial, we conducted a cost-consequence analysis to assess the health system benefits of preventing progression to severe COVID-19 in outpatient populations in the United States. A decision-analytic model in the form of a decision tree was constructed to evaluate two treatment strategies for high-risk patients with confirmed, symptomatic COVID-19 in the primary analysis: treatment with a 10-day course of fluvoxamine (100 mg twice daily) and current standard-of-care. A secondary analysis comparing a 5-day course of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was also conducted. We used a time horizon of 28 days. Reported outcomes included cost-savings and hospitalization days avoided. The results of our analysis indicated that administration of fluvoxamine to symptomatic outpatients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19 was substantially cost-saving, in the amount of $232 per eligible patient and prevented an average of 0.15 hospital days per patient treated, compared with standard of care. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was also shown to be cost-saving despite its higher acquisition cost and provided savings to the healthcare system of $625 per patient treated. These findings suggest that fluvoxamine is likely to be a cost-effective addition to frontline COVID-19 mitigation strategies in many settings, particularly where access to nirmaltrevir-ritonavir or monoclonal antibodies is limited.

19.
Epidemiology ; 33(6): 797-807, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2190880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Marine recruits training at Parris Island experienced an unexpectedly high rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, despite preventive measures including a supervised, 2-week, pre-entry quarantine. We characterize SARS-CoV-2 transmission in this cohort. METHODS: Between May and November 2020, we monitored 2,469 unvaccinated, mostly male, Marine recruits prospectively during basic training. If participants tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) at the end of quarantine, they were transferred to the training site in segregated companies and underwent biweekly testing for 6 weeks. We assessed the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prevention measures on other respiratory infections with passive surveillance data, performed phylogenetic analysis, and modeled transmission dynamics and testing regimens. RESULTS: Preventive measures were associated with drastically lower rates of other respiratory illnesses. However, among the trainees, 1,107 (44.8%) tested SARS-CoV-2-positive, with either mild or no symptoms. Phylogenetic analysis of viral genomes from 580 participants revealed that all cases but one were linked to five independent introductions, each characterized by accumulation of mutations across and within companies, and similar viral isolates in individuals from the same company. Variation in company transmission rates (mean reproduction number R 0 ; 5.5 [95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0, 6.1]) could be accounted for by multiple initial cases within a company and superspreader events. Simulations indicate that frequent rapid-report testing with case isolation may minimize outbreaks. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 among Marine recruits was approximately twice that seen in the community. Insights from SARS-CoV-2 outbreak dynamics and mutations spread in a remote, congregate setting may inform effective mitigation strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disease Outbreaks , Military Personnel , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Phylogeny , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , United States/epidemiology
20.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 1006315, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2198988

ABSTRACT

Background: One of the lessons learned from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is the importance of early, flexible, and rapidly deployable disease detection methods. Currently, diagnosis of COVID-19 requires the collection of oro/nasopharyngal swabs, nasal turbinate, anterior nares and saliva but as the pandemic continues, disease detection methods that can identify infected individuals earlier and more quickly will be crucial for slowing the spread of the virus. Previous studies have indicated that dogs can be trained to identify volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced during respiratory infections. We sought to determine whether this approach could be applied for detection of COVID-19 in Rwanda and measured its cost-saving. Methods: Over a period of 5 months, four dogs were trained to detect VOCs in sweat samples collected from human subjects confirmed positive or negative for COVID-19 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. Dogs were trained using a detection dog training system (DDTS) and in vivo diagnosis. Samples were collected from 5,253 participants using a cotton pad swiped in the underarm to collect sweat samples. Statistical analysis was conducted using R statistical software. Findings: From August to September 2021 during the Delta wave, the sensitivity of the dogs' COVID-19 detection ranged from 75.0 to 89.9% for the lowest- and highest-performing dogs, respectively. Specificity ranged from 96.1 to 98.4%, respectively. In the second phase coinciding with the Omicron wave (January-March 2022), the sensitivity decreased substantially from 36.6 to 41.5%, while specificity remained above 95% for all four dogs. The sensitivity and specificity by any positive sample detected by at least one dog was 83.9, 95% CI: 75.8-90.2 and 94.9%; 95% CI: 93.9-95.8, respectively. The use of scent detection dogs was also found to be cost-saving compared to antigen rapid diagnostic tests, based on a marginal cost of approximately $14,000 USD for testing of the 5,253 samples which makes 2.67 USD per sample. Testing turnaround time was also faster with the scent detection dogs, at 3 h compared to 11 h with routine diagnostic testing. Conclusion: The findings from this study indicate that trained dogs can accurately identify respiratory secretion samples from asymptomatic and symptomatic COVID-19 patients timely and cost-effectively. Our findings recommend further uptake of this approach for COVID-19 detection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL